Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of the Glenohumeral Ligaments: An Anatomic Study

Authors:

Peter J. Millett, MD, MSc, Maj Travis J. Dekker, MD, MC, USAF, Zachary S. Aman, BA, Liam A. Peebles, BA, Hunter W. Storaci, BS, Jorge Chahla, MD, Ph.D., and Matthew T. Provencher, MD, MC, USNR

Abstract:

Background:

While several studies have qualitatively described the anatomy of the glenohumeral ligaments, there remains a lack of consensus regarding their quantitative humeral and glenoid attachment sites.

Purpose:

To quantitatively and qualitatively describe the anatomic humeral and glenoid attachment sites of the glenohumeral ligaments and their relationship to well-established anatomic landmarks.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

A total of 10 nonpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were included in this study. A 3-dimensional coordinate measuring device was used to quantify the location of pertinent bony landmarks and soft tissue attachment areas. All subcutaneous tissues and musculature were removed, with the exception of the rotator cuff (respective muscle bellies cut at their musculotendinous junctions) and the long head of the biceps tendon. The superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL), middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL), anteroinferior glenohumeral ligament (AIGHL), posteroinferior glenohumeral ligament (PIGHL), and coracohumeral ligament (CHL) were then transected. Coordinates of points along the perimeters of attachment sites were used to calculate areas, while coordinates of center points were used to determine distances between surgically relevant attachment sites and pertinent bony landmarks.

Results:

The mean length of the SGHL humeral attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 9.5 ± 3.2 mm, spanning from 12:55 to 1:40, while the SGHL glenoid attachment to the labrum was 1.9 ± 1.2 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim, spanning from 12:30 to 12:45. The mean length of the MGHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 16.4 ± 3.0 mm, equating to 2:10 to 3:35 on the humeral head clockface, and the glenoid attachment was confluent with the labrum, attaching 1.5 ± 1.0 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim and thus extending from 1:50 to 2:35 on the glenoid clockface. The mean length of the AIGHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 12.0 ± 3.0 mm, spanning from 4:05 to 5:10 on the humeral head clockface. The AIGHL bony footprint on the glenoid neck was 48.4 ± 24.5 mm2. The confluent attachment of the AIGHL to the labrum was 1.2 ± 0.9 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim, corresponding to 3:30 to 4:05 on the glenoid clockface. The mean length of the PIGHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 12.0 ± 1.4 mm, spanning from 7:40 to 8:50 on the humeral head clockface. The PIGHL attachment to the labrum was 1.2 ± 0.5 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim. This attachment to the labrum was calculated to span from 7:35 to 8:50 on the glenoid clockface. The mean length of the CHL origin from the coracoid was 12.9 mm, with its most anterior point located a mean of 14.1 mm from the tip of the coracoid. The mean length of the CHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 10.0 ± 4.0 mm, spanning from 11:55 to 12:40 on the humeral head clockface.

Conclusion:

Glenohumeral ligaments were consistently identified in all specimens with minor anatomic variability for the SGHL, MGHL, AIGHL, and PIGHL. Important landmarks including the cartilage surface of the humerus, the bicipital groove, and the clockface can be utilized intraoperatively when attempting anatomic repair of these structures.

Clinical Relevance:

There are multiple open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures that rely on anatomic restoration of these static stabilizers to provide optimal shoulder function and prevent recurrent instability. The qualitative descriptions are comparable with current literature; however, this study is the first to quantify the glenohumeral capsular and ligamentous attachments. The data provided allow for reliable landmarks to be established from known bony and soft tissue structures.

You may request the complete study: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of the Glenohumeral Ligaments: An Anatomic Study

Request Study

Peter Millett, MD

Average rating:

39 reviews

Alexandra Thompson

Mar 23, 2024

by Alexandra Thompson on Peter Millett, MD

110%

Dr. Millett and his team did a SLAP tear repair and bicep tenodesis on my left shoulder. I use my arms as an artist, and love to swim in the ocean, surf, paddle, and telemark ski. So regaining full use of my shoulder and keeping my bicep attached was very important to me. Now, over two years later, my shoulder has the equivalent range of motion as my other arm and as before the injury, and no pain. After the first three months it felt so good and was so strong that - to my horror - I completely forgot my six-month follow-up.

Not only did Dr. Millett and his team make my arm as good as new, but having had the experience of such kindness and expertise throughout the process of surgery and recovery is like an added shoulder superpower.

Thank you Rita, Brooke, Jason, Sarah, Camille, Olivia, Dr. Millett and everyone! And see you soon when my husband comes in for his knee...

Jeff Chandler

Jan 31, 2022

by Jeff Chandler on Peter Millett, MD

Flawless procedure, Easy recovery

Dr. Millet's repaired my knee and tibia, following a botched operation by a different surgeon. That procedure was virtually pain free and I was weight bearing within a few days. That was 18 years ago and the knee is still strong. A few years after the knee incident, Dr Millet repaired my shoulder. My insurance company approved me for 3 months of disability following that surgery. I was off pain medication in 2 days and had 90% range of motion within a week. I withdrew my disability claim and returned to work within two weeks of surgery. I’m not a famous athlete—just a regular guy. Nonetheless, I was treated like an NFL at the Steadman clinic. Most notable was the time for recovery. Other surgeons perform their hour-long task in the OR and don’t involve themselves in the other functions. Peter and his team manages the entire process from diagnosis, anesthesia, nursing care, and therapy. He takes a holistic approach to patient care and doesn’t skip any steps.

Jenn West

Jul 2, 2021

by Jenn West on Peter Millett, MD

Saved My Life

I went to Dr. Millett after 7 knee surgeries (6 on my right and 1 on my left) and had seen 11 different surgeons who all refused to remove femur metal from my right leg. I am highly allergic to metal and the chronic pain was leaving me bedridden for 3.5wks out of a month. He personally wrote me back on my inquiry, listened to my concerns, scheduled my surgery within a week (due to insurance issues) and personally followed up with my recovery. The level of patient care from Dr. Millett and his ENTIRE team is above any care I have ever received in my 20 years of dealing with orthopedic surgeons. There are not enough words to describe the level of care, dedication and professionalism you receive from Dr. Millett and his staff.
My only disappointment is that I did not find him sooner!!!